What do you think about this article that says most who voted in MA for health care wanted to SAVE the bill? - ma health care proxy form
http://www.politicsdaily.com/2010/01/20/ ...
Obviously, most people who voted in Massachusetts ... were busy with other issues. This shows that their decision to reject Obama at all.
Am I right?
10 comments:
When looking at the article itself is not so impressive. 56% of 1,000 people said their main issue was health care. It is 560 people. Which 53% voted for Coakley - which is 297th The rest of the people, which is about health care, which agreed to care for Brown 263rd That is less than 34 people.
As Rasmussen wrote:
"The outlook is even gloomier than we, the correlation between the adoption of the plan of care.
· Among those who gained greatly in favor of the plan to Congress Coakley 97% of the vote.
· Among those who strongly opposed the plan voted 98% for Brown.
· Coakley also won 90% of those who join the plan soon, while Brown was supported by 78% of those who come to oppose it.
• A key to the victory of Brown is that 41% strongly against the plan, while only 25% strongly in favor. "
And certainly do not believe that voters rejected Obama - the only certificates.
And more - the economy is not better. Obama was right about one thingThings said that were chosen are the same as Brown has been elected. If the economy is bad the party in power always loses.
I think they have right to ask, but you can come up with something that is not there.
53% to 56% of the voters is slightly less than 30%. In a sample of 1000 is 3% to 4% error rate.
But what we found that somewhere around 30% of voters, the most important health care issues and voted to consider Coakley.
Pollster Frank Luntz asked a group of voters in Massachusetts, and I think it's fair to say that we were delayed for Obama's visit and speak their own health care (perhaps by accidentally) and set the political left. Pelosi, who had no more than Obama. They also believed that Brown was more like Teddy Kennedy.
A slight error in one ... it means "salvation of the reform," not "Bill."
What the liberals do not believe that the Conservatives do not want to kill the reform, they want real reform of the reform, not the insult of a bill that the Democrats are trying to RAM in the throat.
Democrats in Congress have said that basically it does not matter what people want, they will not hear Republican ideas to reform and had to corruption of some members of his own party resort to vote! That alone should be a clue!
We need health reform. No doubt. We need to raise a genuine reform, not a law that debt, rising insurance costs, fewer medical services available to the government in the driver's seat, but as doctors!
This is necessary, but Democrats are not willing to be available.
The Warlocks
People Coakley said the other day when he was convicted, not louder on Wall Street get. But I've just read that on Wikipedia "In 2009, Coakley settlements of $ 60 million from Goldman Sachs [27] and 10 million from Fremont Investment & Loan [28], who won for the misuse of loans," subprime "loans and . *
Brown, however, the tax is contrary to the ill-gotten gains on Wall Street.
There should be many independent bankers MA or a few populist wrong.
PS Your questions have been raised tonight, excellent!
Yes, boy, you're right. Political experts and other misguided policies. Spin away if you feel better. It is good that you practice. You will need it. When the Democrats said they had learned a lot from this loss, not for you.
Not bad ... People who voted for Brown Mist sick of Obama ... They have general care (and what not) and do not want to pay more taxes for everyone
This is an opinion of Obama supporters and void.
I think he has tremendous skills in the interpretation of the references.
Brown explicitly said they would vote against it. All voters know. This investigation must speak.
Here are all true believers can be in the articles.
Post a Comment